Just a week after Apple’s World Wide Developers Conference, initial benchmarks for the new ARM-based custom Apple Silicon used by developers as part of the Apple Developer Transition Kit are out. The results are quite surprising, putting up numbers that come close to Apple’s current Intel Macbooks, and even surpassing Microsoft’s ARM-powered Surface Pro X.
According to the Geekbench 5 benchmarks sported by Pierre Dandumont on Twitter, the single-core score benchmarks on the processor ranges between 752 and 844. The multi-core score, which is more representative of common productivity tasks, meanwhile, comes in between 2,582 and 2,962.
In both cases, the tests appear to be virtualized through the Rosetta 2 emulation software which is used to translate apps built for Intel-based computers. The physical hardware, though, includes 16GB of RAM and a 512GB solid-state-drive, as well as the Apple A120X SoC — all inside a Mac mini enclosure.
These results are quite respectable for Apple’s ARM silicon. Single-core benchmark results for Microsoft’s custom ARM-based SQ1 processor come in at a 764, and multi-core at around 2,983.
In Microsoft’s case, this is through native testing, on native hardware, without any emulation — suggesting that Apple’s new ARM silicon has quite the power in native on-device situations. Even the Intel Processors in Apple’s own MacBook Air comes close to the Apple ARM silicon, with a 1,133 single-core Score and a 2,990 multi-core score.
As Apple’s results are emulated, the overall performance of native software can only possibly improve. Apple claims it is working closely with developers to ensure such a quality experience. The Developer Transition Kit is part of that work, alongside a more phased approach to bringing ARM-based Macs to the market.
Apple said it won’t sell the first ARM Mac until 2021, which ensures developers will have the time to rework their apps. Microsoft, meanwhile, released its ARM-based computer, the Surface Pro X, at the end of last year.
There are also many other ARM-based Windows laptops, running Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC. Dubbed by Microsoft as Always Connected PCs, these include devices such as HP Envy x2, Lenovo Miix 630, and the Samsung Galaxy Book 2.
Compared to devices with Intel chips, these devices have longer battery life and the benefits of cellular connectivity, but the performance has been heavily criticized due to the underlying app emulation in Windows 10. It remains unknown if this, too, will be a problem for Apple, but these leaked benchmarks do offer hope.
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.