A malware Mac package slipped past Apple’s verification process, a new report finds. As per security researcher, Patrick Wardle, Apple inadvertently approved a malicious desktop app that was disguised as an Adobe Flash installer to trick users.
Apple allows Mac users to install apps from sources outside of its own App Store. However, to ensure this policy doesn’t end up infesting Macs with viruses and malware, the company has a process called “notarization” that scans apps for security issues. Developers are required to submit their code prior to distribution for approval. If an app is unable to get past this verification stage, it is automatically blocked by Mac’s built-in screening program, Gatekeeper — irrespective of where it was downloaded from.
Wardle discovered that a popular malware called Shlayer, which security firm Kaspersky labeled as the most common threat that Macs faced in 2019, featured snippets of code that were officially notarized by Apple. Therefore, if someone downloaded and tried to run this on their Mac, they wouldn’t be alerted through any warnings. Shlayer is an adware that can intercept your web traffic and replace the webpages you try to load with its own malicious ads.
Apple’s review process couldn’t detect the malware and green-lighted it to run on all macOS versions, even Big Sur that is currently in beta.
“As far as I know, this is a first: malicious code gaining Apple’s notarization ‘stamp of approval’,” Wardle wrote in the blog post.
Since it was reported, Apple says it has patched and revoked the notarized payloads. Soon after that, however, the same group of attackers somehow released a new, notarized package — which Apple confirmed has been banned as well.
“Malicious software constantly changes, and Apple’s notarization system helps us keep malware off the Mac and allows us to respond quickly when it’s discovered,” Apple commented in a statement to Digital Trends. “Upon learning of this adware, we revoked the identified variant, disabled the developer account, and revoked the associated certificates. We thank the researchers for their assistance in keeping our users safe.”
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.