Satoshi Nakamoto, who created BitCoin, has been nominated for the Nobel Prize in Economics. Just one problem — no one knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is!
Bitcoin, once seen as a novelty, is increasingly garnering mainstream attention, and even acclaim. A recent The Economist cover story said that blockchains, the technology that makes Bitcoin possible, could change the world. And now Bhagwan Chowdhry, Professor of Finance at UCLA Anderson School, is nominating Nakamoto for the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences – whoever Nakamoto may be.
“I am completely serious in suggesting Satoshi Nakamoto for the Prize,” Chowdhry wrote in a blog post for the Huffington Post. “The invention of bitcoin – a digital currency – is nothing short of revolutionary.”
Chowdhry went on to explain how the currency is “secure, relying on almost unbreakable cryptographic code” while also “bypassing governments, central banks and financial intermediaries such as Visa, Mastercard, Paypal, or commercial banks, eliminating time delays and transactions costs.”
There are all sorts of implications here, of course, and world governments are starting to take notice in a big way. But as impressive as Bitcoin itself is, blockchains — the peer-to-peer technology used by Bitcoin to confirm transactions without need for a central server — might be the most revolutionary part of Nakamoto’s work.
“Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin Protocol has spawned exciting innovations in the FinTech space by showing how many financial contracts – not just currencies – can be digitized, securely verified and stored, and transferred instantaneously from one party to another,” wrote Chowdhry.
It’s not a terrible argument, though it’s hard to say if mainstream economists will agree. But there’s possibly an even more interesting is the question of whether Nakamoto might reveal him, her, or themselves to accept the prize.
Little is known about Nakamoto. No records of any entity of that name exist before 2009, when a paper explaining how Bitcoin could work, and the code for BitCoin itself, was published by someone using the name. To this day it’s not clear if Nakamoto is an individual or a collaboration – some theorize it’s an anonymous individual, others think it could be a network of people, or even financial institutions. Various news organizations have tried to find Nakamoto over the years, but none have succeeded.
Whoever Nakamoto is, the $1 million cash prize Nobel winners receive might not be enough to lure him/her/them out from hiding. The public Bitcoin transaction logs show his/her/their Bitcoin wallet contains around US$250 million worth of the currency. More than enough money to live in comfort anonymously, we think, with or without the Nobel prize money.
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.