Antitrust officials with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission have asked Internet giant Google for more information about its planned acquisition of mobile advertising provider AdMob, indicating the agency is taking a closer look at the deal. Google acknowledged in a blog post the request is the second time the agency has come looking for additional information, and that the company has been working with the FTC over the last few weeks.
In November, Google announced a plan to acquire AdMob for some $750 million in an all-stock deal. Google plans to leverage AdMob’s services and technology to offer advertising both for mobile services as well as within mobile applications for platforms like the iPhone, BlackBerry, and (of course) Google’s own Android platform. Industry watchers see the FTC’s increased scrutiny of the deal as a direct result of Google’s dominance of the Internet search advertising market, as well as Google overall success in recent years. However, the additional review may mean it takes longer for a deal to close, potentially giving competitors more time to respond.
Google has said it does not expect any regulatory issues with the AdMob acquisition.
For the record, here’s Google’s complete blog post:
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Posted by Paul Feng, Group Product Manager
Since we announced our plans to acquire AdMob, we’ve been excited about the positive reaction — particularly from advertisers and publishers who have told us that they’re enthusiastic about the possibilities for how the combination of AdMob and Google can improve the effectiveness of mobile display advertising.
As we said when we announced the deal, we don’t see any regulatory issues with this deal, because the rapidly growing mobile advertising space is highly competitive with more than a dozen mobile ad networks.
That said, we know that closer scrutiny has been one consequence of Google’s success, and we’ve been talking to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission over the past few weeks. This week we received what’s called a “second request,” which means that the FTC is asking for more information so that they can continue to review the deal.
While this means we won’t be closing right away, we’re confident that the FTC will conclude that the rapidly growing mobile advertising space will remain highly competitive after this deal closes. And we’ll be working closely and cooperatively with them as they continue their review.
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.