Google launched its first-generation wireless router in 2016, simply branded as Google Wifi. The set of thick puck-size devices enabled users to blanket their homes in a mesh Wi-Fi network: a more efficient and reliable method of extending wireless internet coverage over the previous repeater-style process. Google Nest Wifi is the successor to the company’s original mesh-capable wireless routers, but what advantages does it bring? In this battle of Google Wifi versus Nest Wifi, we took a look at each system to see which would work best in your home or office.
Google’s original first-generation Wifi product is made of plastic and available in a single color — white. Each small puck is 4.1 inches in diameter and stands just 2.7 inches high. In comparison, Google’s Nest Wifi has a bit of variance depending if we are discussing the primary router or the mesh extenders. The Nest Wifi router is a tad bit thinner around the waist at 3.56 inches, but taller at 4.33 inches. The Nest Wifi point (the mesh extender) is slightly smaller at 3.43 inches round and 4.02 inches tall.
From an aesthetic standpoint, Google Wifi maintains a sharper design with a flat top and sharp line cuts on the side. The Nest Wifi unit goes for a smoother, rounder appearance that is more in line with Google’s Home products. Where Google Wifi was only available in the color white; however, with Nest Wifi, while the router itself is still available only in white, the Wifi points are available in white (Snow), light blue (Mist), and light pink (Sand).
Google Wifi was designed with dual AC1200 2×2 Wave 2 Wi-Fi and TX Beamforming technology; the result is a fast router with a strong signal that can cover up to 1500 square feet with a single unit. Each Wifi unit also sports two Gigabit Ethernet ports for wired connectivity, allowing you to plug in wired devices in various spots around your home.
On the other hand, Nest Wifi takes coverage up a notch with the Wifi router base station covering up to 2,200 square feet and each Wifi point covering up to 1,600 square feet. The system’s internal configuration includes AC2200 MU-MINO Wi-Fi technology with 4×4 (5Ghz) and 2×2 (2.4Ghz) antenna configurations. Wifi point units house AC1200 MU-MIMO Wi-Fi technology and a single 2×2 (2.4Ghz/5Ghz) configuration. Only the primary Wifi router offers Dual Gigabit Ethernet ports.
Both Google Wifi systems support a wide array of Wi-Fi standards, including 802.11 a, b, g, n, and ac (Wi-Fi 5), and are — theoretically — equally as fast. The latest Wi-Fi 6 standard, ax, is not available on either product.
When it comes to the first-generation Google Wifi product, there aren’t a ton of unique features; the system can be controlled via the Google Wifi app, but that’s about it. Nest Wifi, however, is filled with a few surprises, including a built-in Google Assistant in every Wifi point. While the Wifi router itself is absent of a Google Assistant, each Wifi point (the mesh extenders in the network) features a far-field microphone array and a 40mm speaker driver. Using Nest Wifi points, you can call up Google with the “Hey Google” command and have your questions answered, or start playing the latest tunes from your favorite media service.
Both Google Wifi and Nest Wifi offer smart technology to keep your experience as reliable as possible, including selecting the least congested wireless channel for transmitting and choosing the fastest available band for your devices. Due to the Nest’s implementation of Google Assistant in each Wifi point, its feature set is a bit better.
Google Wifi can be found at participating retailers featuring a price cut. Google Wifi originally appeared for $130 on its launch, but can now be found for $100 — this set includes only one Google Wifi router, with each additional one costing another $100. A single Nest Wifi router can be purchased for $170, with each extra Nest Wifi point costing another $150. Google does offer discounts, such as the Nest Wifi router and two points kit for $350.
While Nest Wifi offers impressive features, there is no denying that you can obtain the first-generation Google Wifi system for a remarkable price.
Both Google Wifi and Nest Wifi are excellent products, but Nest Wifi pulls ahead with its smaller design, improved range, and Google Assistant integration. However, at the price that Google Wifi has now made itself available, it continues to be an intriguing offer. Additionally, if you are someone who would prefer that Google doesn’t have microphones placed in your home, Google Wifi is the way to go.
For the best of modern mesh Wi-Fi, however, Nest Wifi is your best bet.
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.