HP released an updated version of its premier consumer laptop, the excellent Spectre x360 14, and it remains one of the best 2-in-1s you can buy. It’s well-made, offers a ton of flexibility, and is one of my favorite laptops I’ve reviewed.
But it’s going up against the Apple MacBook Pro 14, which sits alongside the HP on our list of best laptops. When it comes to laptops that are both portable and powerful, though, the Spectre x360 still falls behind the MacBook Pro in some important ways.
The Spectre x360 14 starts at $1,040 which is $410 off its normal price of $1,450) for an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. With a Core Ultra 7 155H, 32GB of RAM, and a 2TB SSD, the Spectre costs $1,450 (also $410 off the regular price).
The MacBook Pro 14 starts at a higher price — $1,599 for a base M3 and 512GB of storage, but only 8GB of RAM. Apple charges $200 to get to 16GB of RAM, making it $759 more than a similar configuration of the Spectre x360 14.
You can get a MacBook Pro 14 with an M3 Pro 11/14, 18GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD for $1,999, providing better performance than the high-end Spectre for $549 more. Fully configured with an M3 Max 16/40, 128GB of RAM, and an 8TB SSD, the MacBook costs a whopping $6,899.
The Spectre x360 14 is a redesign of the Spectre x360 13.5, upping the display size by half an inch and smoothing the edges. It retains the notches cut into the bottom of the display and the rear chassis, which house a Thunderbolt 4 port and the 3.5mm audio jack. It’s a more elegant and streamlined design, available in Nightfall, Black, Slate Blue, or Sahara Silver — all of which make it more attractive than its predecessor.
The MacBook Pro 14 possesses the blockier and more minimalist aesthetic shared by all modern MacBooks. It is available in Space Gray, Silver, and Space Black, and boasts an elegance that few laptops can match. The MacBook has thinner bezels and a notch in the display to accommodate the webcam, while the HP’s bezels are slim enough except for the thick bottom chin that accommodates the 360-degree hinge.
As a 2-in-in laptop, the Spectre x360 14 offers a few advantages over the MacBook Pro 14. First, it has a pen-enabled touch display, whereas the MacBook has no touch options. Second, the display swivels around to work in clamshell, tent, media, and tablet modes. That offers a lot more flexibility than the clamshell-only MacBook Pro 14.
Both laptops are constructed from CNC-machined aluminum, and both are solidly built. The MacBook Pro 14’s hinge is smoother and allows opening the laptop with one hand, while the Spectre’s is stiffer to accommodate the 2-in-1 functionality.
The MacBook Pro 14 sports the best keyboard on a laptop, the Magic Keyboard, with large keycaps, plenty of key spacing, and switches that are light, snappy, and precise. The Spectre’s keyboard also has large keycaps and excellent key spacing, but its deeper switches aren’t quite as precise due to a less comfortable bottoming action with less feedback.
The Spectre x360 14 has an excellent haptic touchpad with virtual clicks that feel natural and responsive, and it’s even larger than the MacBook’s equally excellent Force Touch touchpad. The MacBook Pro 14’s touchpad has the Force Click feature that provides additional functionality with more forceful clicks, which the Spectre x360 14 doesn’t offer.
The Spectre x360 14 offers the better videoconferencing experience.
Connectivity is mixed. The MacBook offers an additional Thunderbolt 4 port and an HDMI connection, with the Spectre having a legacy USB-A port. The MacBook Pro 14 has a full-sized SD card reader, while the Spectre omits an SD reader entirely. That favors the MacBook. On the other hand, the Spectre supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4, while the MacBook is stuck on Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.
The Spectre x360 14 has a 9MP webcam that supports up to 2160p video, which is a higher resolution than the MacBook’s 1080p webcam. The Spectre’s webcam also has hardware-based lowlight correction and offers a variety of AI-enhanced features. HP also includes user presence-sensing technology that leverages an infrared camera to lock the laptop and put it to sleep when the user steps away, and wake it up and log back in when the user returns.
The MacBook Pro 14 has the Touch ID fingerprint reader in the power button, and that’s it. Note that the Spectre also has a fingerprint reader in the power button to go with Windows 11 Hello facial recognition.
The Spectre x360 14 uses Intel’s latest Meteor Lake chipsets, specifically the 28-watt Core Ultra 125H (14 cores, 18 threads) and Core Ultra 7 155H (16 cores, 22 threads). We tested it with the latter and found it performs better than Intel’s previous 28-watt chips, but not remarkably so. The Core Ultra chipsets are notable for their new neural processing units (NPUs) and potentially improved efficiency. The Spectre is limited to Intel Arc integrated graphics, which are faster than the previous Intel Iris Xe graphics, but not as fast as entry-level Nvidia discrete GPUs. Unlike some other 14-inch laptops, no discrete graphics options are available, which limits its performance compared to the MacBook Pro.
Apple’s MacBook Pro 14 is available with various M3 chipsets, including the base M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, with differing CPU and GPU core counts. We tested the highest-end M3 Max with 16 CPU cores and 40 GPU cores. That’s a very fast chipset in both CPU- and GPU-intensive tasks.
The MacBook Pro 14 with the M3 Max is significantly faster than the Spectre x360 14. It’s also much more expensive. We haven’t tested the MacBook with the base M3 processor, but the Apple iMac with that chip performs similarly to the Core Ultra 7 155H. The M3 is likely to provide similar performance in the MacBook Pro 14.
The Spectre x360 14 is available with a 14-inch 2.8K OLED display running at up to 120Hz. That’s roughly the same sharpness as the Liquid Retina XDR Mini-LED panel on the MacBook Pro 14. Both displays run at up to 120Hz.
The Spectre’s colors are wider and more accurate than the MacBook’s, although both are good enough for serious creative work. Both displays have near-perfect black levels in incredible contrast, while the MacBook’s Mini-LED display has more standard dynamic range (SDR) brightness by default while providing a searing 1,600 nits for high dynamic range (HDR) video.
Both displays are excellent for productivity users, creators, and media consumers. The latter group will be much happier with the class-leading HDR performance on the MacBook Pro 14.
The MacBook Pro 14 has six speakers and force-canceling woofers that pump out the loudest and highest-quality audio you’ll find on a 14-inch laptop. Mids and highs are crystal clear, while there’s also plenty of bass.
The Spectre x360 14 has four speakers, including two woofers that fire out the front, and it provides some of the best audio short of the MacBook. It, too, produces plenty of volume, with clear mids and highs. The biggest difference is in the amount of bass to accentuate music and action TV show and movies. The Spectre is very good, but the MacBook is excellent.
The Spectre x360 14 and MacBook Pro 14 are similar in width and depth, with the former being slightly thicker and the latter slightly heavier. Both are highly portable machines.
The biggest difference comes in battery life. The Spectre x360 14 has an average battery life of around eight hours of web browsing and 14 hours of video. The MacBook Pro 14 will hit around 18 hours of web browsing and likely slightly more when looping video. If working a full day is important to you, then the MacBook Pro will last that and even more. Comparing these two laptops directly makes that difference painfully obvious.
The Spectre x360 14 is the best convertible 2-in-1 available today. It’s fast, well-built, has a beautiful OLED display, and has good battery life. The MacBook Pro 14 can be configured to be much faster (especially in the graphics department), and it has equally good build quality, a stunning mini-LED display, and the best battery life on a 14-inch laptop.
The difference comes down to whether you want the flexibility of a 2-in-1 or a traditional clamshell. Of course, price is also important because the MacBook Pro 14 is more expensive in all configurations. In the end, you can’t beat it on battery life, though — and that’s something no Windows laptop has been able to compete with.
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.
Nearly a month after announcing the GPT-6.1 Sol model, OpenAI unveiled GPT-6.1 Terra today. The latest addition to the family focuses on computer use, visual reasoning, coding, and professional work, while costing 50% less through the API than GPT-5.6 Terra.
OpenAI says Terra can handle everything from filling out browser forms and working inside spreadsheets to interpreting technical drawings and editing videos. The company says it can also complete computer-based tasks more than three times faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.