Imagine paying for an expensive Mac only to discover you’re not getting full Thunderbolt 4 speeds. That’s what some M1 Mac pro users are reporting after several transfer speed tests.
Howard Oakley from Eclectic Light performed different tests with the 2021 16-inch M1 Max MacBook Pro and a 2022 Mac Studio, also with the M1 Max. He also used a range of external SSDs from both Crucial and Samsung. The tests suggests that although both Macs support Thunderbolt 4, they don’t support the USB 3.1 Gen 2 standard, hindering transfer speeds.
Oakley first determined what the theoretical speeds were by connecting the external SSDs to an Intel iMac Pro and verified that USB 3.1 Gen 2 was supported. For context, USB 3.1 Gen can transfer up to 10 Gb/s. He also ensured that only certified Thunderbolt 4 cables were used.
The actual tests included transferring 160 files ranging in size from 2 MB to 2 GB. As a control, the Intel iMac Pro recorded 470 MB/s read speeds and 480 MB/s write speeds. By contrast, Oakley confirmed that read speeds on M1 Macs ranged between 386 Mb/s and 406 Mb/s while write speeds were between 430-435 MB/s.
Connecting to one of the two ports on the front of the Mac Studio using a Thunderbolt 4 cable produced terrible performance at 20 MB/s reads and 37 MB/s writes.
Here is a summary of the results:
At the end, Oakley offers several conclusion and recommendations, one of which is for those with USB 3.1 Gen 2 devices to use Thunderbolt 3 docks or the USB ports on the Studio Display. He also mentions that Apple should have informed people about slower transfer speeds or issued a firmware patch if the slow speeds are due to bugs.
Admittedly, with the exception of the front USB ports on the Mac Studio, the transfer speeds aren’t terrible compared to the actual USB 3.1 Gen 2 spec. However, with customers paying at least $2,000 for a base M1 Pro MacBook Pro and M1 Max Mac Studio, one would hope to get the full Thunderbolt 4 speeds.
Related Posts
New study shows AI isn’t ready for office work
A reality check for the "replacement" theory
Google Research suggests AI models like DeepSeek exhibit collective intelligence patterns
The paper, published on arXiv with the evocative title Reasoning Models Generate Societies of Thought, posits that these models don't merely compute; they implicitly simulate a "multi-agent" interaction. Imagine a boardroom full of experts tossing ideas around, challenging each other's assumptions, and looking at a problem from different angles before finally agreeing on the best answer. That is essentially what is happening inside the code. The researchers found that these models exhibit "perspective diversity," meaning they generate conflicting viewpoints and work to resolve them internally, much like a team of colleagues debating a strategy to find the best path forward.
Microsoft tells you to uninstall the latest Windows 11 update
https://twitter.com/hapico0109/status/2013480169840001437?s=20