An unnamed and entirely unknown AMD graphics card has appeared in the OpenVR benchmark paired up with an unnamed AMD CPU. That mystery is only compounded by the result, as together they managed to beat every Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti on the table, including heavily overclocked ones, by a sizeable margin. Is this the “Big Navi,” GPU that team red fans have been waiting for? It sure seems like it.
Since the release of AMD’s RX 5700 graphics cards in July 2019, speculation about when it would launch a new high-end graphics card has gathered traction. There have been rumors of AMD staff testing an alleged “Nvidia Killer” graphics card, and CEO Lisa Su has repeatedly stated that we can expect AMD to return to the top of the graphics card performance spectrum. But with no announcement of anything close to “Big Navi,” at CES 2020, many suspected we’d be waiting a long time to learn more. With this leaked result, perhaps not.
Discovered by Reddit user MuchCharles, the mysterious AMD graphics card appeared in the OpenVR benchmark results testing on an HTC Vive headset at 90Hz, with a resolution of 1,512 x 1,680. It managed a score of 103.32. For comparison, the most heavily overclocked Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti at those specifications managed a score of just 88.10.
Although the CPU was listed as unknown by the benchmark, VideoCardz broke down the code to discover that it is most likely an AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, paired up with a supremely powerful graphics card. Or two.
There are some caveats here, such as OpenVR being a very new benchmark and is not as widely used as other testing software, like UL’s 3DMark, so it probably doesn’t have the broadest section of systems for comparison. Engineering samples do have a tendency to throw testing software off, too. And there’s also a slight chance that we’re looking at a super-powerful Nvidia graphics card, but that the benchmark detected the 4800H’s onboard graphics as the GPU and named it as such.
But the creator of the benchmark, certainly thinks the GPU is AMD and draws some other interesting conclusions.
They make it clear that they don’t know any more than us, and can’t look into the results any more than the score and listed hardware. That said, they point out that standard 2080 Ti graphics cards tend to get around a score of 80, and the 88.1 score of the top 2080 Ti is a heavily overclocked version. That suggests that this unnamed Radeon GPU is around 17% faster than the top 2080 Ti, and close 30% faster than a stock 2080 Ti. That puts it outside the realms of anything we’ve ever seen from AMD or Nvidia.
The OpenVR author highlights that it might be possible for a heavily overclocked, liquid-nitrogen-cooled Titan RTX or 2080 Ti to achieve such a score, but that seems unlikely since the benchmarker was using a standard (albeit engineering sample) laptop CPU. If they were opting for maximum possible performance, they’d have used a desktop CPU and performed a similar overclock on that component too, surely?
Considering it’s extremely unlikely for someone to have access to both an engineering sample of an unreleased AMD CPU, and an Nvidia GPU at the same time, it is probable that what we’re looking at is an engineering sample of an unannounced AMD graphics card. That means it very well could be Big Navi. It could be a pair of 5700 XTs in crossfire too… but that seems less likely, as crossfire is effectively useless in modern gaming.
If it is Big Navi, and AMD has a GPU that can beat a 2080 Ti by almost a third, that’s huge news for team red fans. It might not be enough to take the performance crown when Nvidia reveals its Ampere GPUs — which will also be based on 7nm — later this year. But this would still be by far the most capable graphics card AMD has ever released, and give gamers and enthusiasts an option when it comes to high-end performance.
It might even do something about the crazy prices we’ve seen at the top of the GPU scale for the past few years.
Mozilla is giving Firefox’s Smart Window two new tricks. If you haven’t tried it yet, Smart Window is an optional AI mode in Firefox with a built-in chat that helps you get things done while you browse. With this update, it can fill out online forms using details from your tabs and keep an eye on websites for you.
Tired of typing the same details into every form?
The absolutely absurd idea of putting a touchscreen display on a mouse isn't exactly new. Turtle Beach already did it with its Command Series MC7, which features a 2.25-inch control screen. But apparently, even that wasn't ridiculous enough for Arctic Fox Technologies. Its new Super Mouse looks like someone took the chunky old Atari ST mouse, slapped a touchscreen and scroll wheel on it, and called it an upgrade.
The result is a rather unusual-looking mouse that is now on Kickstarter, starting at $199. And as ridiculous as it looks, some of its features are genuinely intriguing.
Apple is less than a day away from launching its highly anticipated OLED MacBook Pro with a touch-sensitive screen. But it appears that the upgrade is going to cost a pretty penny. According to a report by Bloomberg, Apple is reportedly eyeing a starting price of $2,899 for the 14-inch MacBook Pro, while the 16-inch version could start at $3,399 in the US.
"At $2,899, the 14-inch model would mark the highest starting price for a new MacBook Pro model, surpassing the $2,799 Apple charged for a 17-inch version introduced in 2006," says the report. The report claims that Apple is targeting a minimum price hike of $400 for its upcoming redesigned 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models.