The pandemic has proved facial recognition systems such as Apple’s Face ID are not built to recognize people under masks. Now, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government body responsible for accessing such systems, has backed it with more conclusive evidence and says it’s now exploring new models that are designed to handle masked faces.
In its latest study, the NIST has revealed that masks can significantly thwart facial recognition algorithms’ accuracy and raise the error rate to as much as 50% — even in the case of some of the best and widely used commercial platforms. The report adds that the systems performed worse when the mask was black in color and was worn higher up the nose area.
“With the arrival of the pandemic, we need to understand how face recognition technology deals with masked faces,” NIST computer scientist Mei Ngan in the report. “We have begun by focusing on how an algorithm developed before the pandemic might be affected by subjects wearing face masks.”
Unlike the controversial facial recognition systems that are being employed, for instance, to identify protesters, this NIST study focuses on one-to-one algorithms that try to match two photos of the same person. Such systems can be generally found at immigration checkpoints for passport verification or on modern phones.
Ngan adds that the team, for its next round of studies, is now examining new facial recognition tech that is engineered with masked faces in mind and one-to-many searches. “Later this summer, we plan to test the accuracy of algorithms that were intentionally developed with masked faces in mind,” she added.
Masked faces have been a topic of concern for federal agencies that depend on facial recognition tech. In a recent internal bulletin (via The Intercept), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security expressed worry over “potential impacts that widespread use of protective masks could have on security operations that incorporate face recognition systems.” Notably, the NIST study was drafted in collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate, and Customs and Border Protection.
However, the rampant use of facial recognition systems across the United States and the growth of controversial startups such as Clearview A.I. has faced pushback from both privacy advocates and tech giants. Over the last few months, several companies such as Microsoft and IBM have pledged to not invest facial recognition systems entirely.
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.