Nvidia is now halting all tests regarding autonomous vehicle driving on public roads. The company formerly tested its driver-free technology in California, New Jersey, Japan, and Germany. But the fatal crash in Arizona involving one of Uber’s self-driving cars pushed Nvidia into re-thinking its strategy. Just one error can be devastating.
“The accident was tragic. It’s a reminder of how difficult self-driving car technology is and that it needs to be approached with extreme caution and the best safety technologies,” a Nvidia spokesperson said. “This tragedy is exactly why we’ve committed ourselves to perfecting this life-saving technology.”
A driver-free Uber vehicle struck a pedestrian late Sunday night in Tempe, Arizona. Elaine Herzberg, 49, was walking outside of the crosswalk when she was struck by the vehicle. She was rushed off to a hospital but died later from the injuries. Uber has since halted all autonomous vehicle testing on public roads.
A big chunk of Nvidia’s keynote during its GPU Technology Conference opening focused on autonomous vehicles. Nvidia founder Jen-Hsun Huang admitted that safety is the hardest computing problem. Because so much is at stake, it needs to be addressed “step by step” to prevent future accidents similar to what happened in Tempe and Uber’s vehicle.
“This is the ultimate deep-learning, A.I. problem,” he said. “We have to manage faults even when we detect them. The bar for functional safety is really, really high. We’ve dedicated our last five to seven years to understanding this system. We are trying to understand this from end to end.”
He believes that autonomous vehicles will drive better than humans. They will be the staple of society as humans move away from cites due to overcrowding. Humans are also becoming more dependent on Amazon-like services where products are shipped to their doorsteps rather than customers venturing out to the store. Another 1 billion vehicles will come into society over the next 12 years, he predicted.
For now, until Nvidia understands why the Uber vehicle struck a pedestrian, the company will depend on simulations and private lots to train its autonomous vehicle technology. As for its “fleet” of manually driven data collection vehicles, they will continue to roll across America’s highways.
One topic discussed during Tuesday’s keynote focused on perception: The ability for the car to understand its surroundings. That includes the perception of space, distance, objects of any shape, scenes, paths, the weather and more totaling 10 “networks.” Nvidia plans to assign ten high-powered DGX-2 systems to each network.
Huang also introduced the company’s next-generation supercomputer for self-driving cars called Drive Orin. The successor to the current Drive Pegasus model, it combines multiple Pegasus computers into one Orin package, providing more computing power in the same physical space. The company set out to require less power from the battery too, increasing the vehicle’s overall mileage.
Also during the keynote, Nvidia showcased means for remotely taking control of a real-world autonomous vehicle using a virtual reality headset.
Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.
How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?
Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind.
The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year).
Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?
According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.