Article Image

Apple 5G modem business could take years to develop, Qualcomm president says

In an exclusive interview at IFA 2019, Qualcomm President Cristiano Amon made clear that the Apple partnership is anything but over.

Apple purchased Intel’s 5G modem business for a billion dollars in late July – so will Tim Cook and Co. write Qualcomm out of the will completely? In an exclusive interview at IFA 2019, Qualcomm President Cristiano Amon made clear that this partnership is anything but over. Reports of its death have been highly exaggerated.

“We have restarted our relationship with Apple. I think we settled our disputes, and we have signed a multiyear agreement for our chipset. We said multi, we didn’t say one year or two years, we said multi,” he noted with a smile. “So we feel very confident about our ability to be a supplier to Apple.”

While Qualcomm dominates the 5G market, Amon noted that there are several other companies in the space, including Huawei and Samsung. It took them seven to ten years to build out a 5G solution, he noted. So Apple’s acquisition doesn’t mean it will immediately be able to turn on its own chips, despite the company’s stated plans to build its own 5G chips by 2021.

“It’s not an easy task … as long as modem technology continues to change, we feel good about our position,” Amon said. One key fact is the evolution of antenna technology, which has had a profound impact on modern radios and will shape how we use 5G. Phones used to have a single antenna that was shared with GPS and Wi-Fi; phones that use millimeter wave tech (one popular form of 5G network) have as many as 16 antennas, and the interaction between the radio and the antenna forms a crucial part of the experience.

At IFA 2019, Qualcomm announced “modem to antenna” 5G solutions. “We don’t think about ourselves as just a modem maker. We have been building everything from modems to PAs to filters to tuners to switches and you name it,” Amon told Digital Trends. In other words, even if Apple can rapidly ramp up the new chipset arm, it will still be dependent on companies like Qualcomm for other parts of the system.

“We have a unique relationship. We see them as a competitor but we also see them as a customer, so it’s a relationship of ‘co-opetition,’” he said. Huawei buys chipsets from Qualcomm, and its small cell equipment uses Qualcomm chipsets as well. That said, like any American company, recent restrictions by the U.S. government on who can do business with Huawei have put a damper on that business. Its future remains uncertain. “Like any other American company, we have limitations on what we can do with them at this point. Like all of the other American companies, we’ve applied for a license, and we’re awaiting a response.”

Concerns have swirled for years around potential backdoors in Huawei networking gear, a fundamental part of the infrastructure. Many companies rely heavily upon Huawei gear for their country’s networking; in the U.S., those concerns have led President Trump to draw strict limits around the company’s ability to do business with America and its companies. In a recent Bloomberg Businessweek interview, Microsoft President Brad Smith said he thought such rules were unfair, but his requests for more detailed info have been ignored.

“Oftentimes, what we get in response is, ‘Well, if you knew what we knew, you would agree with us,’” Smith said. “And our answer is, ‘Great, show us what you know so we can decide for ourselves. That’s the way this country works.’”

Amon is less blunt in his assessment, noting that 5G has broad applications outside of the computing and telecom industry, areas with very different concerns. Citing a partnership with one of Europe’s largest power providers to build a private 5G network for its business, a hack or security breach has profound implications.

“One thing is, somebody hacks into your Facebook account. The other is, somebody brings the power grid down. It’s a completely different thing,” he said. “There’s a lot of politics.”

The absolutely absurd idea of putting a touchscreen display on a mouse isn't exactly new. Turtle Beach already did it with its Command Series MC7, which features a 2.25-inch control screen. But apparently, even that wasn't ridiculous enough for Arctic Fox Technologies. Its new Super Mouse looks like someone took the chunky old Atari ST mouse, slapped a touchscreen and scroll wheel on it, and called it an upgrade.

The result is a rather unusual-looking mouse that is now on Kickstarter, starting at $199. And as ridiculous as it looks, some of its features are genuinely intriguing.

Apple is less than a day away from launching its highly anticipated OLED MacBook Pro with a touch-sensitive screen. But it appears that the upgrade is going to cost a pretty penny. According to a report by Bloomberg, Apple is reportedly eyeing a starting price of $2,899 for the 14-inch MacBook Pro, while the 16-inch version could start at $3,399 in the US.

"At $2,899, the 14-inch model would mark the highest starting price for a new MacBook Pro model, surpassing the $2,799 Apple charged for a 17-inch version introduced in 2006," says the report. The report claims that Apple is targeting a minimum price hike of $400 for its upcoming redesigned 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models.

I've spent a good amount of time digging into the spec sheet of the new M6 MacBook Pro (14-inch), and for all intents and purposes, this is a classic Apple "chip and connectivity" refresh. It's not a full redesign. The chassis, Liquid Retina XDR panel, speakers, ports, and battery, all of them carry over unchanged.

However, the M6 brings more cores, stronger on-device AI, higher memory bandwidth on the larger configs, and modern wireless. Here’s the practical rundown of what actually improved, and whether those gains are worth your money.