Music making is increasingly digitized here in 2020, but some analog audio effects are still very difficult to reproduce in this way. One of those effects is the kind of screeching guitar distortion favored by rock gods everywhere. Up to now, these effects, which involve guitar amplifiers, have been next to impossible to re-create digitally.
That’s now changed thanks to the work of researchers in the department of signal processing and acoustics at Finland’s Aalto University. Using deep learning artificial intelligence (A.I.), they have created a neural network for guitar distortion modeling that, for the first time, can fool blind-test listeners into thinking it’s the genuine article. Think of it like a Turing Test, cranked all the way up to a Spınal Tap-style 11.
“It has been the general belief of audio researchers for decades that the accurate imitation of the distorted sound of tube guitar amplifiers is very challenging,” Professor Vesa Välimäki told Digital Trends. “One reason is that the distortion is related to dynamic nonlinear behavior, which is known to be hard to simulate even theoretically. Another reason may be that distorted guitar sounds are usually quite prominent in music, so it appears difficult to hide any problems there; all inaccuracies will be very noticeable.”
To train the neural network to recreate a variety of distortion effects, all that is needed is a few minutes of audio recorded from the target amplifier. The researchers used “clean” audio recorded from an electric guitar in an anechoic chamber, and then ran it through an amplifier. This provided both an input in the form of the unblemished guitar sound, and an output in the form of the corresponding “target” guitar amplifier output.
“Training is done by feeding the neural network a short segment of clean guitar audio, and comparing the network’s output to the ‘target’ amplifier output,” Alec Wright, a doctoral student focused on audio processing using deep learning, told Digital Trends. “This comparison is done in the ‘loss function,’ which is simply an equation that represents how far the neural network output is from the target output, or, how ‘wrong’ the neural network model’s prediction was. The key is a process called ‘gradient descent,’ where you calculate how to adjust the neural network’s parameters very slightly, so that the neural network’s prediction is slightly closer to the target amplifier’s output. This process is then repeated thousands of times — or sometimes much more — until the neural network’s output stops improving.”
You can check out a demo of the A.I. in action at research.spa.aalto.fi/
San Francisco startup Dimensional advertised for people to walk robot dogs through city streets. The New York Times reported that the job could include carrying a roughly 33-pound robot back to the office if it overheated. A lift home is an awkward requirement for a labor-saving machine.
Keeping the hardware running is only one challenge. Anthropic's robotics tests found that language models mostly failed when controlling joints directly, but did better when directing trained controllers. Giving an AI agent a body doesn't teach it to handle ordinary household objects.
Soon, a mattress protector may be more than a bed cover. Australian medtech company Sleeptite and researchers at RMIT University have received a US patent for FlexiSense, a smart bedding technology that tracks body position and posture to help caregivers identify when older residents may be at risk of falling.
The technology is being developed for Sleeptite’s in-bed monitoring system, REMi, and was recently on display at The MedTech Conference in Boston. A peer-reviewed study in Flexible and Printed Electronics says the sensors can also be made at scale without sacrificing performance or durability.
AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.
The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.