“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

NOCS currently sells four different headphones, with three of them consisting of the in-ear canal design: the NS200, NS600 and the NS800. The NS200, priced at around $60 to $70, are designed to provide a warm and rich sound with an emphasis on bass. Currently, it appears that you can only purchase them in Sweden, although we would not be surprised to see them found in Apple stores as they do have Apple’s stamp of approval.
The NS200’s come packaged with a carrying pouch, four ear tips so you get the correct fit, a cord clip to minimize cord noise and a two-year warranty (which is pretty extraordinary for earphones in this price range).
It’s clear at first glance that NOCS is mainly targeting the Apple crowd with their sharp, minimalistic design. From the product packaging, which consists of clean lines and accessories nestled in white packaging, to the labelless three-button in-line control and aluminum driver enclosures, they were designed to mate with Apple products. You can even purchase these in white to match your iPod if you want to. The included accessories are nothing to write home about, and seem pretty standard. In contrast, Jays another Swedish headphone manufacturer, gives you five total ear tips, a nice hard carrying case, headphone splitter and airline adapter – all for about the same price as the NOCS.
The NS200’s feature an 8.6mm “dynamic” driver, a 95dB sensitivity rating and a frequency response of 20Hz to 20KHz, which is pretty standard these days. As mentioned, the driver enclosure of the NS200’s is made out of aluminum and contains a port in the rear.
We tested the NS200’s using an Apple iPhone 4, iPod nano, and Apple iMac 27-inch computer. Music in our tests included: The Faint’s Wet from Birth, Royksopp’s Melody A.M., Beck’s Modern Guilt, and The Whitest Boy Alive’s Dreams. We also broke in the NS200’s for more than 20 hours, which is definitely recommended for these earphones. Their sound color changes for the better after the stiff drivers are broken in.
Before we get into our sound tests, it’s worth pointing out that while the NS200’s are canal phones and should provide a nice snug fit in the ear canal, we did experience outside noise leakage in our tests regardless of which sleeves we used. This is attributed to the shallow depth of the enclosure – it simply does not push the driver as deep into the canal as it probably should. Pushing them in with your finger will give you an idea of what they could sound like. Holding them side-by-side to the Thinksound ts02+’s shows that the NS200’s are a full quarter-inch shorter.

The in-line controls work as described, and we did not experience any issues with operation. We like that NOCS added three buttons, two for volume, and the middle one to control the music. In our phone tests, everyone we called said we sounded clear and were easy to hear through the in-line microphone.
After prolonged use, we experienced little to no ear fatigue, although we prefer the soft clear tips that come with the Thinksound earphones.
The NOCS NS200 earphones cater to a particular type of listener, those who prefer a nice, tight environment where bass is not overwhelming, but deep and present when needed. The NS200’s are not the best-sounding earphones we have listened to in this price range, but if you were deserted on an island with these and the upgraded Apple earbuds, we would definitely go with these. The inline microphone, controls and iPhone compatibility are a nice touch, but if you are willing to deal with a little control frustration, we would recommend the Thinksound ts02+ earphones, which we think sound better. Otherwise, if you absolutely do not need the phone controls, we would definitely recommend the Jays a-Jays series, which are among our favorites.
AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.
The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.
Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.
Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).
AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.
The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.