“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“
Vers Audio, a company priding itself on creating natural-sounding audio products while using sustainable environmentally friendly materials (mainly wood) has introduced its first iPhone-compatible ear phones, the Vers 1E.
Priced at an affordable $49.99, the 1E ear phones are available in three different types of wood: bamboo, walnut and cherry. Due to Vers Audio’s environmental stance, we would put the company as a direct competitor to ThinkSound, another company pushing green design with headphones sculpted from wood.
With a minimalistic approach to design, the Vers 1E feature an off-white headphone cable and come with three pairs of silicon sleeves to ensure a nice snug fit in your ears. The clear silicon sleeves tend to be quite a bit softer than their black silicon cousins; a trait that we prefer as it eliminates a lot of the ear fatigue people tend to experience after prolonged use. Also included in the package is a nice carrying case produced using recycled metal. Instructions are not included in the package, however, so if you are not familiar with how the single clicker remote works on an iPhone, you’ll have to ask a friend or Google.

Vers claims that the 1E’s are compatible with the Apple iPhone, iPod or “Any device with a 3.5mm headphone jack” which is clearly a claim that anyone should be skeptical about. Another embellishment is the claim that a canalphone can block 90% of outside noise through passive noise cancellation. We have yet to really see this with any earphone out there.
We tested the Vers 1E with the Apple iPhone 4, Motorola Droid X and the Blackberry Bold 9700. Music in our tests included Kanye West Graduation, Lil Wayne Tha Carter II, Zero 7 When it falls. We also broke the Vers E1’s in for 10 hours before testing.
The E1’s have a snug fit when positioned correctly, although the clear silicon tips are almost too soft, and tended to fold when pushed in too much. As for the 90% noise cancelation claim, while they did help block outside noise, you could still hear cars and people while walking and listening to music downtown.
Out of the box, it’s apparent that the E1’s need to be broken in as bass, and mids are very flat; so do not make a decision until you spend some time with them. Even after some breaking in, bass is nice and deep, but bottoms out and becomes muddy at high volumes. Mid-range is not as warm as the ThinkSound ts02mic’s, which we reviewed a while back. (Keep in mind though, that the Thinksounds carry a $20 premium over the E1’s.) Vocals are a tad bit distant depending on the genre of music you are listening to. Acoustics are rich and warm, although the bass during acoustic performances tends to overwhelm a bit.
The in-line microphone and remote are a real issue for the E1’s. In our tests, the inline remote control worked well on our Motorola Droid X (and we would assume any Android-based phone). The clicker was able to play and pause the music in both the Pandora app, and while playing music directly from the phone. The microphone also worked well in our call tests, and you are able to mute the call by clicking on the remote while talking. The same was true for our Blackberry 9700 Bold test, the remote and microphone worked as advertised. The only difference we could tell between the Android and BlackBerry phones and the Apple iPhone 4 is that double clicking the remote would move the song to the next track on the iPhone, but would not on the other two aforementioned phones.

At this point in time, we cannot recommend the Vers E1 earphones, as there appears to be a major manufacturing defect with their Apple compatibility. If you own a non-Apple phone or MP3 player, then the E1’s work fine and there is little to complain about. From a pure musical standpoint, they sound good as long as you are selective with your musical genre; we don’t like that the bass bottoms out at high volumes in addition to getting muddy. If using an environmentally friendly product is very important to you, we would recommend that you look at the Thinksound ts02+mic ear phones. They sound better and work with any phone out there.
San Francisco startup Dimensional advertised for people to walk robot dogs through city streets. The New York Times reported that the job could include carrying a roughly 33-pound robot back to the office if it overheated. A lift home is an awkward requirement for a labor-saving machine.
Keeping the hardware running is only one challenge. Anthropic's robotics tests found that language models mostly failed when controlling joints directly, but did better when directing trained controllers. Giving an AI agent a body doesn't teach it to handle ordinary household objects.
Soon, a mattress protector may be more than a bed cover. Australian medtech company Sleeptite and researchers at RMIT University have received a US patent for FlexiSense, a smart bedding technology that tracks body position and posture to help caregivers identify when older residents may be at risk of falling.
The technology is being developed for Sleeptite’s in-bed monitoring system, REMi, and was recently on display at The MedTech Conference in Boston. A peer-reviewed study in Flexible and Printed Electronics says the sensors can also be made at scale without sacrificing performance or durability.
AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.
The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.