Article Image

Zombie drone hack reminds us why flying robots are terrifying

Just days after Amazon and UPS revealed potential plans to deliver packages using drones, hacker Samy Kamkar has created a system, dubbed SkyJack, that enables a person to use their personal UAV to take over other drones.

There’s been a lot of talk about unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) this week, what with both Amazon and UPS teasing us with potential plans to launch drone delivery services in the next couple of years. It’s almost enough to make a man feel that having the sky filled with swarms of flying robots will be normal – or at least not crazy. And then comes this.

Well-known hacker Samy Kamkar revealed this week a DIY system that allows anyone to use their drone to completely take over other drones it finds, and turn them into a hoard of “zombie drones,” reports Ars Technica. Zombie drones don’t just whiz around looking for brains like you might expect, though. Instead, all overtaken drones are at the command of the person who launched the attack. So they’re more like the Borg from Star Trek or an army of ants. If you want to take them out, you need to find the queen.

“Today Amazon announced they’re planning to use unmanned drones to deliver some packages to customers within five years. Cool!” wrote Kamkar in a blog post published Monday. “How fun would it be to take over drones, carrying Amazon packages … or take over any other drones, and make them my little zombie drones. Awesome.”

Kamkar calls his system SkyJack, and it consists of both software and hardware. On the software end, we have a number of obscure apps that anyone this side of computer nerdom has probably never heard of (aircrack-ng, node-ar-drone, node.js), as well as Kamkar’s custom-built SkyJack software. As for hardware, Kamkar uses the Parrot AR.Drone 2 outfitted with a Raspberry Pi mini-computer, USB battery, and two types of wireless adapters.

All combined, the SkyJack system is able to hunt down other drones that are nearby, attack them via Wi-Fi signal, take them over, and put them in control of whoever launched the attack via laptop of iPad. The system can launch attacks from both the ground and the air.

Now, this hack really isn’t a big deal at the moment – there just aren’t that many drones flying around these days. But that will soon change, when the Federal Aviation Administration begins allowing UAVs into U.S. airspace in far greater numbers starting in 2015. The FAA estimates that we could see as many as 15,000 drones in the sky by 2020 – just six years from now. Here’s hoping the agency sorts out SkyJack-level vulnerabilities before the zombie apocalypse attacks from above.

[Image via Tyler Olson/Shutterstock]

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.