Have you ever seen a trailer that just completely knocks your socks off, only to have your hopes dashed by the final product? For most movie fans, the answer to that question is a resounding “yes.” The reason is simple: Making a great trailer and making a great film are two very different skills. Masterful editing, a killer soundtrack, and selective exposition can make a Razzie contender look like an Oscar winner, and vice versa.
Over the years, there have been dozens of great trailers cut from subpar films and we’ve compiled a list of our favorites from the recent past. Check out these 10 awesome trailers for not-so-awesome films and indulge in the bittersweet heartache of wondering what could have been.
Why the trailer was awesome: It’s simple; it’s elegant; it’s epic; it’s Superman. While we were surprised to see Clark Kent go all Deadliest Catch on us, there’s something alluring about the idea that an anonymous workaday stiff might just secretly be the savior of the universe.
Why the movie was less awesome: For some reason, Hollywood (or, more specifically, Zach Snyder) keeps trying to make Superman dark and edgy, forgetting that this franchise could and should be one thing above all else: Fun. The original film became a classic precisely because it didn’t take itself too seriously — it acknowledged and embraced the inherent silliness of its premise. The next time this franchise is rebooted (and it WILL be rebooted) let’s all remember that no one wants a somber Superman.
Why the trailer was awesome: The Smashing Pumpkins’ dirge-like The End Is the Beginning Is the End sets the tone for this epic, eerie, slow-burning trailer. Though it features just a line or two of actual dialogue, the spot speaks volumes, telling us all we need to know about these deeply flawed, so-called superheroes.
Why the movie was less awesome: Recent history will tell you that comic books and graphic novels translate well to the big screen — but this story may have been the exception to the rule. The film does its darnedest to weave Alan Moore’s multiple, subversive storylines together, but something about the finished product just feels bloated and … messy.
Why the trailer was awesome: This trailer had multiple laugh-out-loud moments (see: Leslie Jones’ description of Galifianakis’ mugshot) and gave fans high hopes for a Dumb and Dumber-style, so-stupid-it’s-smart comedy. Beyond that, there’s something fun and infectious about this spot, offering an energy and momentum that, unfortunately, didn’t translate to the film itself.
Why the movie was less awesome: What do you do if you’ve got a lackluster comedy on your hands? Pack all of your best jokes into a 2-minute trailer and reel in as many moviegoers as you can. Masterminds’ laughs are sporadic, and its shtick wears thin long before the end credits roll.
Why the trailer was awesome: This trailer does a fantastic job of distilling the financial/emotional roller coaster that the film itself is looking to deliver and the percussive, subterranean sound of Barns Courtney’s Glitter & Gold syncs up with the action perfectly. Plus, something about the way Matthew McConaughey says “Gold!” just makes your spine tingle.
Why the movie was less awesome: Despite its intriguing premise, the movie fails to muster any real narrative momentum. While it’s entertaining to watch McConaughey wax poetic about the eponymous precious metal, the rest of the action falls fairly flat.
Why the trailer was awesome: A trailer for a film like this could get away with just cycling through a few flashy, CGI-dripped highlights of the feature presentation, but this spot builds suspense and tells just enough of the story to rope you in. That approach, combined with Daft Punk’s transportive electro-pop score, makes this one of the most intriguing trailers in recent memory.
Why the movie was less awesome: This film wasn’t bad. It was just sort of … meh. Cool visuals, solid story, but it lacked that heart and playfulness that made the original a cult classic. In addition, Bridge’s fully CGI version of his former self wasn’t quite ready for prime time, getting lost in the “uncanny valley.”
Why the trailer was awesome: Don’t lie, the moment that glittering “LucasLtd” logo appeared on the screen, you got the feels. Even though you’ve most likely been disappointed by the film, this trailer just has that Star Wars magic. “Every generation has a legend … every journey has a first step,” cue theme music alongside a pod racer speeding through the Tatooine desert. Lightsabers, laser blasts, strange planets, stranger creatures, freaking Samuel L. Jackson as a jedi — this trailer has it all, and it had everyone who grew up on the franchise positively giddy.
Why the movie was less awesome: Is it terrible? No. Is it a terrible way to kick of the prequels to George Lucas’ hallowed original trilogy? Yes. Too much CGI, too much Jar Jar Binks, too little of the magic that made the franchise perhaps the most iconic in movie history.
Why the trailer was awesome: To watch this spot is to plunge head-first into an adrenaline-fueled potpourri of beautiful people, mind-bending visuals, and no-holds-barred action. It packs 10 pounds of insanity into a five pound bag, and we love it!
Why the movie was less awesome: We promise we don’t have a secret vendetta against Zack Snyder, but this is the third time one of his films has appeared on this list. In this case, the style-over-substance approach is perfect for Sucker Punch’s 90-second trailer, but it wears thin during the 110-minute film. Unfortunately, Sucker Punch just doesn’t feature the sort of cohesive plot that we need to anchor us amidst its barrage of surrealistic madness.
Why the trailer was awesome: We open on Trinity bursting out of a skyscraper window. The action slows down as she whirls around to face an agent who’s hot on her heels. Plummeting towards the busy street below, she fires a pair of pistols at her pursuer; cut to Neo waking up with a gasp; cut to Morpheus delivering the spot’s first line of dialogue: “Here we go.” Within 30 seconds, this trailer had fans of the franchise’s first installment hook, line, and sinker.
Why the movie was less awesome: This film gets a bid of a bum rap. Sure, its plot is convoluted and a few of its action sequences border on the absurd, but it’s far from the epic fail that it’s often made out to be. All that said, it just didn’t quite live up to original, or to the promise of its near-perfect trailer.
Why the trailer was awesome: The tagline puts it perfectly, “The greatest battle. Lies. Within.” It’s Parker Vs. Parker; it’s dark, epic, ominous action set to dark, epic, ominous music; it’s intense, frenetic, and thrilling; it’s everything the film should have been.
Why the movie was less awesome: Oh gosh, where do we start? Actually, it’s obvious where we should start: With emo Peter Parker. Whether he’s behaving as if he wandered on to the set of Footloose, creeping out random women on the street, or swinging from a jazz club chandelier, it’s just so cringeworthy. Even without two of the worst scenes in movie history, however, a glut of both villains and subplots bogs this film down in a doldrum full of the sticky black stuff that transforms our hero into his unwatchable alter-ego.
Why the trailer was awesome: This spot taps into the infectious spirit of adventure that made the original trilogy so beloved and promises a film that picks up right where things left off. It features thrilling chase sequences, narrow escapes, John Williams’ iconic themes, and Harrison Ford punching people in the face — what’s not to like?
Why the movie was less awesome: Jones survives a nuclear explosion by locking himself inside a lead-lined refrigerator. We could go on and on, but do we really need to?
China just gave Hollywood a cautionary tale about AI filmmaking. Sanxingdui: Future Past, billed as the country's first fully AI-generated movie, hit theaters on October 23 and bombed at the box office.
According to Futurism, the film's reported $1.5 million production budget landed on more than 10,000 screens. Yet it pulled in only about $181,000, averaging roughly $20 per screen, making the budget difficult to recover.
Some of the best shots in Grok Imagine’s AI-made Odyssey don’t contain actors. Ancient landscapes stretch into the distance. Close-ups of grimy hands suggest people who have touched something rougher than a keyboard. For a few seconds, the illusion holds.
https://twitter.com/imagine/status/2113712964419063911
YouTube videos could soon look better without eating quite so much data, right? Thankfully, the platform plans to introduce a new video format called AV2 on its web player in early 2027, promising more efficient streaming and potentially fewer playback hiccups on slower internet connections. The big headline is a roughly 30% improvement in compression efficiency over AV1, YouTube's existing video format. That doesn't guarantee every video will use 30% less data, but it could make streaming a little easier on both internet connections and data allowances.
What is AV2, and why should viewers care?