Article Image

Barbarian was good, but Weapons is better. Here’s why.

Director Zach Cregger followed up the success of Barbarian very well with Weapons, which proved to be an even better horror movie.

With the release of his frightening new blockbuster Weapons, writer-director Zach Cregger delivered an incredible follow-up to his previous hit horror film, Barbarian. Though the latter film depicted an Airbnb gone wrong in the worst possible way, Weapons goes far beyond that and displays a town wrought by tragedy after seventeen kids disappear in one night.

Both of Cregger’s horror films are similar in terms of themes, tone, and story structure. Since the director was given a lot more money and resources after the surprise success of Barbarian, he was able to achieve far more with Weapons, presenting a vast and ambitious tale of suburban horror.

Warning: This article contains major spoilers.

Like Barbarian, Weapons features a nonlinear narrative that presents its story through the perspectives of multiple characters. Due to its smaller-scale story, the former movie is only presented through the eyes of three characters: Tess (Georgina Campbell), AJ (Justin Long), and Frank (Richard Brake). The story predominantly takes place in a Detroit home. Meanwhile, Weapons features segments dedicated to six characters and their adventures throughout the town of Maybrook.

This style of storytelling makes both films surprising and unpredictable, especially as they each show characters changing or dying in many shocking ways. However, Weapons succeeds in presenting different perspectives of the shared situations, creating a greater understanding of the characters and the scenes they share. It also allows the film to flesh out the many different people living in Maybrook, bringing more life and realism to it than Barbarian did with its limited depiction of Detroit’s Brightmoor district.

Beneath its over-the-top horror story, Barbarian presents an insightful tale about the horrors and effects of sexual abuse through the actions of its antagonists. The film also explores themes involving gender relations and how misogyny manifests in varying forms in society. This tension is from the very beginning, as Barbarian makes it unclear if Tess should trust the mysterious Keith (Bill Skarsgård) when they find themselves staying in the same house.

Weapons explores similar themes by illustrating how the residents of Maybrook mistreat Justine (Julia Garner) and ignore her suspicions. Both films illustrate how evil can be hiding in plain sight. Weapons sets itself apart from Barbarian by exploring the effects of loss and trauma on the people of Maybrook after several kids disappear, leaving many parents with missing children. Many townspeople succumb to fear and grief, giving into their darker nature and turning on each other in a massive witch hunt for the one responsible for this bewildering tragedy.

Weapons adds more social commentary by exploring many evils embedded in the modern world. The adults of Maybrook engage in violence, adultery, drugs, and alcohol, which hurts themselves and those around them. Even Matthew (Luke Speakman), one of the poor children who had disappeared into the night, turned out to be a bully to Alex (Cary Christopher). Maybrook isn’t the sweet, innocent town one might assume it is, and the kids’ disappearance helped reveal the darkness already dwelling there.

A horror movie is only as scary as its villain. Barbarian unleashed several horrifying surprises through its main antagonist, The Mother — a super-strong, monstrous-looking woman living in secret beneath AJ’s home. Though she doesn’t speak much, the Mother drums up terror and sympathy as a result of Frank’s incestuous sexual assault on his many captives. It is later revealed that the Mother wanted to have a child, meaning her character embodies even greater tragedy and horror.

However, Alex’s Aunt Gladys is an evil, sadistic, and frightening antagonist. Portrayed by actor Amy Madigan, Gladys quickly shifts from a quirky and kind woman to a sadistic witch devoid of empathy. There are zero redeeming or sympathetic qualities about Gladys — she only serves herself and manipulates those around her. With her callous abuse of Alex and the way she forces Marcus to kill his husband, Gladys cements herself as a horrifying figure who encapsulates how incredible evil can take the form of anyone anywhere.

Barbarian and Weapons have each proven themselves to be exemplary films and testaments to Zach Cregger’s talent. Nevertheless, Cregger showcased his true creative potential with Weapons, presenting a larger, more layered story with an even deeper and broader exploration of human nature and evil through its characters. After two movies, Weapons is Cregger’s best motion picture so far.

China just gave Hollywood a cautionary tale about AI filmmaking. Sanxingdui: Future Past, billed as the country's first fully AI-generated movie, hit theaters on October 23 and bombed at the box office.

According to Futurism, the film's reported $1.5 million production budget landed on more than 10,000 screens. Yet it pulled in only about $181,000, averaging roughly $20 per screen, making the budget difficult to recover.

Some of the best shots in Grok Imagine’s AI-made Odyssey don’t contain actors. Ancient landscapes stretch into the distance. Close-ups of grimy hands suggest people who have touched something rougher than a keyboard. For a few seconds, the illusion holds.

https://twitter.com/imagine/status/2113712964419063911

YouTube videos could soon look better without eating quite so much data, right? Thankfully, the platform plans to introduce a new video format called AV2 on its web player in early 2027, promising more efficient streaming and potentially fewer playback hiccups on slower internet connections. The big headline is a roughly 30% improvement in compression efficiency over AV1, YouTube's existing video format. That doesn't guarantee every video will use 30% less data, but it could make streaming a little easier on both internet connections and data allowances.

What is AV2, and why should viewers care?