An ambitious new series that leans heavily on artificial intelligence and carries the name of renowned filmmaker Darren Aronofsky is facing a barrage of negative responses from critics and viewers alike. The short-form series On This Day… 1776, produced by Aronofsky’s AI-focused studio Primordial Soup in partnership with Google DeepMind, TIME Studios, and Salesforce, was meant to be a groundbreaking use of generative AI to dramatize moments from the American Revolutionary War. Instead, it has become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate over AI’s role in creative industries.
The series uses AI image generation tools to produce visuals depicting historical events, while professional voice actors deliver the narration. Despite these pedigree collaborators, the first episodes quickly drew harsh criticism for poor visual quality, uncanny character depictions, and jarring aesthetic glitches that many viewers found distracting and unsettling rather than immersive. Critics described the AI-generated imagery as resembling “AI slop” with uncanny valley effects, distorted text, and an overall lack of cinematic coherence.
Reviews from outlets such as The Guardian and The Hollywood Reporter underscored the severity of the backlash. One reviewer called the visuals “ugly as sin,” noting that reliance on AI cores often resulted in awkward shots and lifeless faces that didn’t match the voice performances. Another critic characterized the series as visually grotesque and failing to deliver compelling storytelling through its current technological approach.
Many calling the project embarrassing or disappointing, especially given Aronofsky’s established reputation for visually distinctive films like Black Swan and Requiem for a Dream. Some commenters expressed concern that associating a high-profile director with this kind of AI-first production could legitimize undercooked creative output and lower audiences’ expectations for storytelling quality.
Industry observers say the series’ reception highlights the gaps between what AI tools can technically generate and what audiences expect from narrative visual media. While hybrid models that combine human artistry with AI assistance are increasingly explored, projects that appear to replace core creative roles with generative algorithms continue to spark controversy. The backlash has also intersected with ongoing discussions about labor protections for actors and the legal and ethical implications of using AI-generated content in entertainment.
Despite the criticism, supporters of AI experimentation argue that early missteps are part of the learning curve in a rapidly evolving field. Future productions may refine workflows and better balance AI’s potential with artistic intent. For now, however, On This Day… 1776 stands as a cautionary example of the challenges facing AI-assisted filmmaking and a reminder that audiences still value human-crafted nuance in storytelling.
Some of the best shots in Grok Imagine’s AI-made Odyssey don’t contain actors. Ancient landscapes stretch into the distance. Close-ups of grimy hands suggest people who have touched something rougher than a keyboard. For a few seconds, the illusion holds.
https://twitter.com/imagine/status/2113712964419063911
YouTube videos could soon look better without eating quite so much data, right? Thankfully, the platform plans to introduce a new video format called AV2 on its web player in early 2027, promising more efficient streaming and potentially fewer playback hiccups on slower internet connections. The big headline is a roughly 30% improvement in compression efficiency over AV1, YouTube's existing video format. That doesn't guarantee every video will use 30% less data, but it could make streaming a little easier on both internet connections and data allowances.
What is AV2, and why should viewers care?
YouTube is changing how its Home page works, giving viewers more control over what shows up there and making some of the app’s most-used sections easier to reach. Custom Feeds are now replacing the existing topic chips for eligible users, while YouTube is also testing a redesigned top bar on mobile that moves Subscriptions closer to the Home feed.
YouTube first started experimenting with Custom Feeds earlier this year, letting you type out what you wanted to watch and turning that request into its own stream of recommendations. Now, the feature is starting to look less like a side experiment and more like something YouTube actually wants people to use as part of their everyday Home page.