In an attempt to improve the quality of content that’s being displayed within the main Facebook feed, the social network announced changes to the algorithm that will reduce the number of articles posted with “click-bait” headlines. If you are unfamiliar with the term “click-bait,” it refers to a sentence or two that’s designed to get the reader to click on the link without offering significant details about the content within the article. Mentioned on the Facebook Newsroom, these types of leading statements often misrepresent the content in the article and are marked as spam when the user returns to Facebook.
Click-bait articles have long taken advantage of Facebook’s news feed algorithm since the number of clicks on a article is one of the metrics that determines the article placement within the feed as well as increasing the number of people that will see the article. To combat click-bait, Facebook is going to track the length of time that the user spends away from Facebook reading the article. For instance, if a user clicks on an article and only spends a few seconds before returning to Facebook, that article will be devalued in the feed.
Beyond the time measurement, Facebook will also add up the number of social actions that occur on the article and compare that against the number of clicks the article receives. For example, if an article receives thousands of clicks, but very few likes or comments on the Facebook post, that factor will reduce the prominence of the article in the feed.
These changes are based off surveys that Facebook distributed among a random sampling of users. One statistic indicated that users prefer headlines that accurately describe the content in the article approximately 80 percent of the time over click-bait style articles.
Beyond click-bait targeting to improve the quality of the feed, Facebook stated that specific types of posts will be devalued with the algorithm changes. Specifically, pages and users that post in the link format will be ranked higher than photo posts that have a URL included in the description. Posts created in the link style include additional information about the article in the description as well as the site URL and possibly the author of the content. Interestingly, this style of post is also more effective within the mobile feed as the entire photo attached to the post is click-able to the site.
In addition to photos posted with a URL in the description, this update will also devalue status updates that include a URL. According to Facebook, these updates will roll out slowly over the next few months. Any sites that consistently publish click-bait articles will see an overall reduction in referral traffic from the social network.
Of course, this isn’t the first change that Facebook has made this year in regards to low quality content. Announced during April 2014, Facebook took steps to reduce the number of “like-bait” posts that ask Facebook users for artificial inflation of likes, shares and comments. This shift was designed to encourage more original content being posted in the feed rather than silly pictures or Internet memes.
Related Posts
WhatsApp has begun testing a long-overdue group chat feature
The Meta-owned messaging platform is testing a new feature called "group chat history sharing" (via a WABetaInfo report). As the name suggests, the feature lets a WhatsApp user (likely the admin) share the chat history (up to 100 messages sent within 14 days) with someone while adding them to a group.
You can now choose the kind of content you see on Instagram Reels
The announcement came from Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri, giving people a more direct way to shape the kind of videos they actually want to see. At its core, Your Algorithm lets users actively tune their Reels experience.
New UK under-5 screen time guidance targets passive time, what it changes for you
The push is rooted in government-commissioned research that links the highest screen use in two-year-olds, around five hours a day, with weaker vocabulary than peers closer to 44 minutes a day. Screens are already close to universal at age two, so the guidance is being framed as help you can actually use, not a ban.