Article Image

MIT researchers say 6 feet may not be far enough while social distancing

If this is correct, we may need to revise guidelines

For the past few weeks, we’ve been redefining our notion of personal space to ensure that we stay a few feet apart for social distancing reasons. Advice varies depending on who you ask, but the prevailing idea is in the vicinity of a couple of meters, the equivalent of around 6.5 feet.

But according to researchers from MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), we may have been greatly underestimating the distance that coughs and sneezes can travel. Instead of distances of  6.5 feet being sufficient to keep us safe, researchers from the Fluid Dynamics of Disease Transmission Laboratory (which, frankly, sounds like it’s pretty perfectly placed to answer this question) think that we should possibly be keeping at least 8.2 meters or 27 feet away from one another. That’s because the gaseous clouds which result from sneezes and coughs, potentially containing COVID-19-conveying droplets, can travel that far.

In “Multiphase Turbulent Gas Cloud From a Human Sneeze,” an article published recently in JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) Insights, the researchers write that: “The rapid spread of COVID-19 highlights the need to better understand the dynamics of respiratory disease transmission by better characterizing transmission routes, the role of patient physiology in shaping them, and best approaches for source control to potentially improve protection of front-line workers and prevent disease from spreading to the most vulnerable members of the population.”

The journal article claims that peak exhalation speeds can hit an astonishing — if terrifying — 33 to 100 feet per second. If the research turns out to be accurate, it could necessitate revising guidelines currently provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), particularly around protective equipment. This would be especially true for frontline healthcare workers, who run the risk of being exposed to COVID-19 far more than the average person.

Nonetheless, there are still other questions to answer. The most significant of these is the distance that coronavirus germs can travel before they are no longer a big threat. There’s still more research to be done on this, joining the countless number of other scientists currently carrying out groundbreaking research right now. But questions like this are absolutely crucial to answer as soon as possible.

For the latest updates on the novel coronavirus outbreak, visit the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 page.

Recently, we've entered an exciting collaboration with Maple Media, creating a bundle of 17 apps worth having on your phone. From relaxed fun to serious productivity boosts, these apps cover all your bases and provide a fun boost to your phone. Normally, the bundle is $9.99 per month (far lower than the cost of using the apps individually), but for your first 7 days you can get access to the bundle for free. View the full Digital Trends App Bundle for a complete list of the apps, or read on for a summarized take.

What's happened? This week, China's Quality Certification Center released information about a battery (EB-BS04898ABY) with a maximum capacity of 4,855mAh. That's the same capacity as was previously seen in the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and fans have taken this certification to mean the Galaxy S26 Ultra will not see a capacity increase after all.

The Samsung Galaxy Ultra models have had the same battery capacity for the last five years.

What's happened? Samsung has officially announced the Galaxy Tab S10 Lite, a budget-friendly alternative to the Galaxy Tab S10. The device has been rumored for months, but this is the first time Samsung has officially acknowledged its existence.

The Galaxy Tab S10 Lite will have a 10.9-inch display and a peak brightness of 600 nits — a bit on the lower side, versus the iPad Pro's maximum brightness of 1,600 nits.