In a wave of fitness trackers and smartwatches that have come crashing down on us in the last few years, Apple, Xiaomi, and Fitbit have been the some of the few companies that have stayed afloat above everyone else. Apple and Fitbit particularly have both provided consumers with some of the most popular wearable technology around, and flagship products, like the Fitbit Surge and Apple Watch Series 2, have become the faces of what a smartwatch and fitness tracker can do.
But when you put the two devices head to head, you start to realize the stark differences. Let’s take a look.
1.34 x .82 x 0.96 inch
Band lengths: Small (5.5 to 6.3-inches in circumference), Large (6.3 to 7.8-inches), and XL (7.8 to 8.9-inches in circumference).
38mm
1.52 x 1.31 x 0.45 inch
42mm
1.67 x 1.43 x 0.45 inch
White Ceramic case
38mm
1.54 x 1.34 x 0.46 inch
42mm
1.68 x 1.44 x 0.45 inch
42mm: 312 x 390
38mm: 28.2 grams
42mm: 34.2 grams
Stainless Steel case (Sapphire Crystal)
38mm: 41.9 grams
42mm: 52.4 grams
Ceramic Case (Sapphire Crystal)
38mm: 39.6 grams
42mm: 45.6 grams
Sapphire crystal glass (stainless steel and ceramic cases)
Two years can feel more like a decade in the tech world, and there’s no better example of that than when you see the specs of the Surge (released in 2014) against the Series 2 (release in 2016.) The Surge holds its own in areas like weight, screen protection, and GPS capabilities, but it really flounders when you put its Monochrome LCD screen against one of the best displays on a smartwatch ever. The Surge also lacks the coveted waterproof stamp, but seeing as people have gotten by without waterproof watches for centuries, we won’t mark it down too much for that. Even with its glaring shortcomings on the spec sheet, we only rated the Surge half a star below what we consider the best smartwatch we’ve ever used, and that’s saying something.
The Surge puts up a good fight, but in terms of hardware, the Series 2 looks flawless compared to its competitor.
Winner: Apple Watch Series 2
The Series 2 is the antithesis of the Surge when it comes to design.
The Surge fits in well while you’re working out, but its huge, rectangular touchscreen and clunky design look outdated. The Surge becomes a bit of eyesore beyond the rec room because it lacks customization, so it’s hard to blend the watch in with work attire or formal garb. The Series 2 on the other hand, has a plethora of customizable design options, from band accessories to interfaces. Even without the added bells and whistles, the watch is still worth clamoring over as-is.
For durability, the Surge is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, which means its going to take a lot to crack its screen. Its also sweat, rain and splash resistant, but it’s not waterproof. The Series 2 is waterproof up to 50 meters, and although it doesn’t have Gorilla Glass protection, it does have strengthened glass that’s just as durable as any other smartwatch. The stainless steel and ceramic models come equipped with Sapphire Crystal glass, which is twice as hard as regular glass.
Part of Apple’s credo has been to integrate design and function in a beautiful way, so the Surge never really had a shot against the Series 2. Even though Surge has great protective glass, it can’t compare to the Series 2’s impressive waterproof capabilities.
Winner: Apple Watch Series 2
Although Fitbit claims the Surge can go for seven days without a charge, our review of the watch noted that we were only able to get four or five days out of the battery. Still, that’s better than the Series 2, which generally lasts a day.
Winner: Fitbit Surge
The Surge is fitted with Fitbit’s proprietary operating system, which does a decent job of tracking your steps, calories, sleep and other activities, but not much else. It has a heart monitoring feature, but there has been a lawsuit over the tech’s inaccuracies. You can also read text messages and control music, but there’s no app store for the Surge.
With Apple’s WatchOS, you’re able to access an array of apps and and control your iPhone right from your Series 2 watch. And unlike the original Apple Watch, the Series 2 comes preloaded with workout options so you can properly track your progress for a myriad of activities.
Both watches come with GPS, and the Surge does a great job of mapping out your run, and tracking your distance and speed. The Series 2 does that too, but you can also use the GPS for things like navigating through a new city or stepping up your golf game.
Winner: Apple Watch Series 2
Since the Surge is an older model, you might have a harder time finding it as readily available as the Series 2 at physical stores, but Fitbit sells the smartwatch at all of its online shops, so you can have it shipped and on your wrist in a matter of hours.
Although it’s always a little tricky to get a hold of a new Apple product the first few weeks after release, it’s gotten easier to find a Series 2 at retailers. The Series 2 is also available in a bunch of styles and designs, including the Nike Plus model. The only style options available for the Surge is what color band you want.
The Series 2 costs $369, and the Surge costs $200. You’re getting a lot of bang for your buck with the Series 2’s price tag, but you might not want or need everything that the Series 2 offers you. Since both watches are readily available, we have to base the winner off price point, so the Surge easily wins.
Winner: Fitbit Surge
Sure, the Surge is cheaper and has a longer battery life than the Series 2, but it’s running on outdated technology. It might seem like a smart buy right now, but whether it’s the Series 2 or something else, you’ll see another smartwatch that’s way better than your Surge, and you’ll feel like you just wasted 200 bucks.
The Series 2’s countless workout features, waterproof capabilities, and integration with your iPhone makes it a watch that can fit into your everyday routine for years to come. If you’re not an Apple Cultist and don’t own an iPhone, the Series 2’s capabilities are lackluster, but you’re still better off buying any of the Android Wear watches available over the Surge.
Related Posts
We review a lot of health wearables. This one tracks something most ignore.
We've discussed the Hume Band’s design ethos before; specifically, how its screen-free, fabric-wrapped profile respects your attention span. But for those who treat their health as a long-term asset, the form factor is secondary to the data.
Rokid’s AI glasses offer a more affordable route to wearables than Meta Ray-Ban
The AI Glasses Style is completely screenless and weighs just 38.5 grams, making it light enough to wear all day without discomfort. Instead of visual overlays, it relies on voice, audio, and a built-in 12MP Sony camera capable of shooting 4K video in clips up to 10 minutes.
Forget the watch, Apple’s AI Pin might be its next wearable move
According to the details shared so far, the wearable is still in the very early stages of development. In fact, Apple could launch it or even cancel it, depending on how engineering and market conditions evolve. That said, people familiar with the project say the company is targeting a 2027 release window, a move that would position Apple directly against other AI wearable efforts from competitors like OpenAI and others experimenting with similar form factors.