Harvard University went on lockdown Monday after administrators received emails claiming bomb threats against four campus buildings. Turns out, there were no bombs – thankfully. Instead, the threats were allegedly sent out by Harvard sophomore Eldo Kim, who The Crimson reports was apparently trying to avoid taking a final exam.

As PJ Vogt at On The Media’s TLDR blog points out, the FBI was able to identify Kim despite the fact that he sent the emails after connecting to Tor, a network that anonymizes users’ IP addresses to make it look like online activity is coming from somewhere else.

Seeing as Tor is often used to access the “deep Web” – content and websites not included in “clear Web” search results from Google or other search engines – where many nefarious communities reside, the network’s ability (or inability) to keep its users anonymous is a hot talking point.

Kim’s problem was not with Tor, but with the way he apparently used it. As the FBI affidavit explains (pdf), Harvard’s IT staff “was able to determine that, in the several hours leading up to the receipt of the e-mail messages described above, Eldo Kim accessed Tor using Harvard’s wireless network.” The administrators were probably able to pinpoint Kim because he was likely one of the few people accessing Tor on Harvard’s Wi-Fi, if not the only one.

Which brings us to this tale’s takeaway: Just because Tor can anonymize your online actives and make them difficult to track doesn’t mean it will – especially not when you’re using a monitored Internet connection. There are ways to use Tor to remain nearly untraceable, as this in-depth slideshow details. Kim, it would seem, did none of it.

Because of this oversight, Kim has been arrested and faces up to five years in prison for his bomb threat hoax. We all know finals suck – but wouldn’t it be easier to take the test?

Related Posts

How to change margins in Google Docs

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

What is Microsoft Teams? The Slack rival does things other collaborative tools can’t

With Microsoft Teams, you're able to chat, video conference, share documents and edit them together, and easily coordinate schedules and workflows. Recently, Microsoft Teams did get a price bump for Microsoft Personal users (from $7 to $10), and the company also added a wave of AI agents into the mix.

Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs. How does each word processing program compare? To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.